Closed · USDA-FAS-10960-0200-10-20-0005 · CFDA 10.960 · Discretionary
Engaging APEC in Sustainable Agricultural Development
Federal grant opportunity posted by Technical Agricultural Assistance 10.960, cataloged on Grants.gov.
- $1-$400K
- Award range
- Closed
- Status
- August 21, 2020
- Close date
- 1
- Expected awards
The verdict
Engaging APEC in Sustainable Agricultural Development is a closed discretionary listing from Technical Agricultural Assistance 10.960 that offered $1 -- $400,000 across 1 expected award. Future funding cycles may be published under the same CFDA number.
- $1-$400K
- award range
- Closed
- application status
- 1
- expected award
- 10.960
- CFDA program
Opportunity snapshot. This Grants.gov announcement - Engaging APEC in Sustainable Agricultural Development - is cataloged under number USDA-FAS-10960-0200-10-20-0005 and tied to CFDA assistance listing 10.960, posted by Technical Agricultural Assistance 10.960. Grants.gov currently shows the opportunity as closed, first posted on August 6, 2020. The funding category is Discretionary, delivered as a cooperative agreement.
Award economics. The award range on file is $1 -- $400,000. The agency has projected $400,000 in total estimated funding for this announcement. It expects to issue 1 award. If the agency funds the expected 1 award from the $400,000 estimated pool, the average award works out to roughly $400,000. Cost sharing is not required, so applicants do not need to commit matching funds to be competitive on this opportunity. Federal award ranges are often upper bounds; actual allocations reflect program appropriations, the strength of the applicant pool, and the evaluation committee's scoring.
Deadline and action path. This opportunity closed on August 21, 2020. Future funding cycles may be published under the same CFDA number, so monitoring the parent program page is the most reliable way to catch re-announcements. Every Grants.gov submission requires an active SAM.gov registration and a Unique Entity ID. Review the Eligibility section below carefully, federal eligibility categories (nonprofit, state or local government, tribal, individual, educational institution, small business) have distinct registration and reporting requirements. Pre-application outreach to the listed agency contact is permitted and often welcomed, it helps clarify scope and scoring priorities. Before acting on the deadline or award figures above, verify them directly on the official Grants.gov listing, amendments can change dates and amounts after this page was last refreshed.
Award Range
$1 -- $400,000
Close Date
August 21, 2020
Posted
August 6, 2020
Est. Total Funding
$400,000
Expected Awards
1
Instrument
Cooperative Agreement
Description
This project is authorized by the following legislation: 7 USC 3291, International agricultural research, extension, and teaching, authorizes the Secretary in part (a) to (1) exchange research materials and results with the institutions or persons, and (5) work with transitional and more advanced countries in food, agricultural, and related research, development, teaching, and extension (including providing technical assistance, training, and advice to persons from the countries engaged in the activities and the stationing of scientists and other specialists at national and international institutions in the countries). Trade Policy and Geographic Affairs (TPGA), Multilateral Affairs Division (MA) is a division of the Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS), an agency within the U.S. Department of Agriculture. MA’s strategic goals are to work through international organizations to build relationships and serve American interests to promote science and evidence-based policy, sustainability, trade liberalization, and new technology and innovation. TPGA works with a number of other U.S. government agencies (e.g., U.S. Trade Representative, Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Department of Commerce, and USDA sister agencies), international organizations, and industry to promote the trade of safe food products globally. As many Asian economies grow rapidly, governments are wrangling with complex public health issues including a pronounced need for updated food safety regulatory systems. While food safety modernization is an essential part of effective agricultural regulation, this trend has caused an increase in onerous non-tariff barriers, as many of the 21 economies in the Asian Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) region lack the capacity to develop these regulations in a way that is consistent with the SPS Agreement and does not overly restrict trade. Unfortunately, this is happening at a time when markets in the region are growing dramatically relative to our exports in the rest of the world. As economies endeavor to update their systems, multi-economy discussion, in the form of a workshop, on the scientific justification provisions of the SPS Agreement will be extremely important to U.S. agricultural exports and MA’s core goal of promoting science and evidence-based policies. Many economies lack the capacity to effectively assess food safety risk and as a result can put in place requirements that are not based in science and overly restrict trade. The workshop will help address knowledge gaps by serving to remind Members that the risk assessment, as regulated under Article 5.1, is the main criteria and means by which scientific justification is attained for the adoption and implementation of SPS measures. We will provide Members with concrete examples of how to notify provisional measures and discuss how Codex Alimentarius and other international standard setting bodies can and should work on procedural steps necessary, given the impossibility of establishing a proper risk assessment, for the adoption and application of provisional measures. Another part of this award will address the larger goal of sustainable agricultural and economic development. Sustainable agricultural development will be critical going forward, and is a key strategic goal of relevant APEC workstreams and USDA. MA will look to contribute to existing and planned engagement by partner economies in sharing information and best practices of food loss and waste prevention, sustainable resource management, and other innovative agricultural practices. Workshop discussions and reports on existing strategies by U.S. experts and those of like-minded members can ultimately enhance capacities of developing economies and expand trade in the APEC region. The issue of aging farmers and agricultural producers is a critical one for food security globally—one that can be addressed by policies that incentivize and encourage youth to become engaged in agriculture. As the APEC region strives to create an inclusive and sustainable economy, it will be vital to ensure that a new generation of farmers is adequately prepared to feed the world. In the United States, the average age of a farmer is 59.4 years in 2019, steadily increasing from 1978 when it was 50.4 years old. This trend can be seen globally, as youth leave their rural towns and seek opportunities elsewhere. OECD and scholarly articles have documented the phenomenon in specific countries, but not as a whole region, until now. The project will examine existing policies regarding involving, engaging, and employing youth in the agricultural industry and related fields in the APEC region. A report will reflect the findings of a desk audit of private and public sector policies and initiatives and their related success. The project will benefit various agricultural stakeholders, but chiefly policy makers will be able to use the resulting report as a reference for future polices, initiatives, and resources that will encourage youth to participate in agriculture in a more direct way. The project will also cover the breadth APEC region and provide examples of successful policies and how they might be applied in other economies. Request for Applications: The activities in this agreement will support the development of an international trading system that is more predictable for U.S. exporters and based on science. This will be achieved by 1) build upon existing knowledge of scientific justification provisions of the WTO SPS agreement among APEC member economies ; 2) encouraging technical collaboration and cooperation among APEC economies; and 3) collecting and synthesizing data that will increase our understanding of APEC economies’ policies regarding youth engagement in agriculture; 4) increased understanding of APEC member economies’ approach to sustainable agricultural and economic development and innovation as a whole. Objectives: The goal of this project is to increase the regulatory and policy making capacity of developing economies in APEC by increasing knowledge on scientific justification provision of the SPS agreement and youth engagement in agriculture.Part of this project will build on previous workshops aimed at reducing trade barriers caused by unnecessary export certificates or pesticide MRLs within APEC. The project will be focused on several workstreams addressing:· The scientific justification workshop will help address knowledge gaps by serving to remind Members that the risk assessment, as regulated under Article 5.1, is the main criteria and means by which scientific justification is attained for the adoption and implementation of SPS measures;· Discuss national experiences implementing the obligation to seek to obtain the additional information necessary for a more objective assessment of risk within a reasonable period of time;· Promote underlying elements of USDA’s Agriculture Innovation Agenda and Science Blueprint· Identifying best practices, policies, and programs to support and encourage youth involvement in agriculture; and· Discussing and sharing information and national experiences on sustainable agricultural development, specifically regarding youth engagement and involvement in agriculture. This project will target policymakers in the 21 APEC economies so that the information gets translated back to the appropriate decision makers who can take action. This project will provide valuable knowledge to policymakers regarding the scientific justification provisions of the SPS agreement and policies. Personnel Requirements: Applicant must have a sophisticated understanding of APEC dynamics and meetings, a familiarity with the APEC export certificate and MRL workstreams, and an operational understanding of how to successfully carry out APEC meetings including: managing complex projects, convening the appropriate experts, implementing and coordinating meeting logistics, communicating with participants, trouble-shooting and resolving logistical issues, distributing participant surveys, collecting/analyzing the survey data, and effectively managing federal funds. Prior experience with the U.S. Government and other policymakers in APEC is highly desired. Applicant will teleconference with FAS as often as FAS deems necessary. Applicant will supply FAS with activity reports and track activity costs as outlined in the agreement.
Eligibility
Grants.gov lists this opportunity under eligibility category code 25. These codes correspond to applicant types (state/local government, tribal organization, nonprofit, educational institution, individual, small business, etc.) defined in Grants.gov's own eligibility reference. See the current Grants.gov eligibility categories or check the official listing below for this opportunity's exact eligibility statement.
Official Listing on Grants.gov
View full details, application forms, and submission instructions.
Parent Grant Program
Schools and Roads — Grants to States
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Agency Contact
Elizabeth Riley Phone: +1-202-720-6868 James Buchanan Phone: +1-202-720-1971 Email: james.buchanan@usda.gov
Key Dates
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this grant opportunity?
Is this opportunity still open?
How much funding is available?
How do I apply?
Disclaimer: This information is sourced from Grants.gov and SAM.gov and is for informational purposes only. Opportunity details, deadlines, and eligibility requirements change frequently. Always verify current information directly on Grants.gov before applying. PlainGrants is not affiliated with any federal agency.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
| Publisher | PlainGrants |
| Sources | the SAM.gov Assistance Listings and Grants.gov |