Closed · RFA-FD-24-025 · CFDA 93.103 · Discretionary

Cooperative Agreement to Support a Human Abuse Potential Study of Botanical Kratom (U01 Clinical Trial Required)

Federal grant opportunity posted by Food and Drug Administration, cataloged on Grants.gov.

up to $2M
Award range
Closed
Status
March 21, 2024
Close date
1
Expected awards

The verdict

Cooperative Agreement to Support a Human Abuse Potential Study of Botanical Kratom (U01 Clinical Trial Required) is a closed discretionary listing from Food and Drug Administration that offered Up to $2,000,000 across 1 expected award. Future funding cycles may be published under the same CFDA number. PlainGrants indexes 481 other opportunities from Food and Drug Administration.

up to $2M
award range
Closed
application status
1
expected award
93.103
CFDA program

Archived opportunity record

Cooperative Agreement to Support a Human Abus… is closed (last close March 21, 2024). The parent program page for CFDA 93.103 is the reliable place to catch re-announcements. Food and Drug Administration still indexes 481 other opportunities here.

According to Grants.gov (extract vintage 2026-08-10), this record reflects the officially published listing. See methodology.

Deadline tracker

Application window closed

Closed March 21, 2024

Posted Jan 16 Closes Mar 21

Est. Total Funding

$2,000,000

Expected Awards

1

Instrument

Cooperative Agreement

Description

An estimated 1.7 million Americans aged 12 and older used kratom in 2021, according to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration’s National Survey on Drug Use and Health. FDA has warned consumers about the use of Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa), a plant indigenous to Southeast Asia. Kratom alkaloids have demonstrated both affinity and activity at mu opioid receptors, receptor sites known to be associated with abuse. Although Kratom use is prevalent, to date, clinical evaluations of abuse potential have not been performed. This research proposal describes a human abuse potential (HAP) study of botanical Kratom. This HAP study will help researchers, scientists, individuals using or considering the use of kratom, and the broader public health community because it will generate important findings related to the safety profile of kratom.The primary objective(s) of the HAP study are to characterize the abuse potential and subjective effects of botanical Kratom. Importantly, FDA currently has a pilot, dose-finding and safety study of botanical Kratom. The pilot study is expected to provide critical information for conducting the HAP study, including information on the Kratom dose, the botanical supply provider, and content for the Investigational New Drug (IND) application (e.g., safety information and chemistry manufacturing and controls (CMC) data). Interested parties are expected to be able to fulfill all the requirements of the IND submission.The study should adhere to the design principles outlined in the guidance for industry: "Assessment of Abuse Potential of Drugs." As described in the guidance, the study should be conducted in a human pharmacology laboratory and can be performed in either an inpatient or outpatient setting. On-site safety measures should be described in addition to subject discharge criteria. The HAP study should be performed in nondependent subjects with a history of recreational drug use, including opioids and botanical kratom. Applicants are expected to provide a statistical analysis plan including a power analysis to justify their proposed sample size. Typically, HAP studies consist of a screening phase, qualification phase, treatment phase, and follow-up visit. During the qualification phase, subjects are administered placebo and a dose of the positive control and evaluated using a bipolar drug liking visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0-100. During the qualification phase, the placebo response should be between 40-60 points while the positive control should produce a score outside of the placebo range and with a difference of at least 15 points greater than placebo. A naloxone challenge phase may be implemented prior to the qualification phase to rule out physical dependence. The treatment phase should be a within-subject, randomized, double-blind, placebo and active controlled study. Two to three doses of a positive control should be employed along with three doses of botanical Kratom to establish a dose-response curve. Selection of the doses of botanical Kratom and the positive control for the treatment phase can be made in conjunction with FDA utilizing data from FDA's pilot dose-ranging study of botanical Kratom. The oral route of administration (using encapsulated botanical Kratom) is expected for the HAP study. Appropriate washout period(s) should be used between sessions.Maximum response (i.e., Emax) on VAS assessments of "drug liking" should be the primary outcome measure. Other measures such as "high," "sedation," and willingness to take the drug again should also be assessed. Novel measures of reinforcement (e.g., behavioral economic measures and/or willingness to pay for drug) may be considered in consultation with FDA. Assessments should be performed at the appropriate timepoints after drug and Kratom administration (e.g., Tmax). Safety and physiological measurements (e.g., pupillometry) should also be implemented. The expected outcome from performing the HAP study is a detailed study report describing the methodology, conclusions, and interpretation of the HAP study results.

Wide-open applicant board · 15 Grants.gov doors

Cooperative Agreement to Support a Human Abus… prints 15 distinct Grants.gov eligibility doors (State governments; County governments; City or township governments; Special district governments; +11 more). Filter fit before reading award size as demand — most applicant classes appear on the row. The extract does not mark applicant cost-sharing as required. Instrument: Cooperative Agreement. Funding-activity codes span Agriculture · Consumer Protection · Food and Nutrition (AG;CP;FN). Only 11 other Food and Drug Administration listings share this exact eligibility-code string (2% of 482).

Code 00
State governments
Code 01
County governments
Code 02
City or township governments
Code 04
Special district governments
Code 05
Independent school districts
Code 06
Public / state-controlled institutions of higher education
Code 07
Federally recognized tribal governments
Code 08
Public / Indian housing authorities
Code 11
Native American tribal organizations (other than Federally recognized tribal governments)
Code 12
Nonprofits with 501(c)(3) status (other than IHEs)
Code 13
Nonprofits without 501(c)(3) status (other than IHEs)
Code 20
Private institutions of higher education
Code 22
For-profit organizations other than small businesses
Code 23
Small businesses
Code 99
Unrestricted / see official listing

Codes are Grants.gov eligibility category values from the extract vintage 2026-08-10. Confirm the full eligibility statement on the official listing or the Grants.gov eligibility reference.

Official Listing on Grants.gov

View full details, application forms, and submission instructions.

View on Grants.gov

Agency Contact

Terrin Brown Grantor

What to do next

Cooperative Agreement to Support a Human Abus… is closed; use the parent program and agency catalog for the next funding cycle.

  • Parent CFDA 93.103 may publish future NOFOs under the same assistance listing. Open program
  • Food and Drug Administration Research indexes 42 Grants.gov listings in this extract. Program profile
  • Food and Drug Administration lists 481 other indexed opportunities on PlainGrants. Agency catalog

Opportunity deadlines and eligibility change on Grants.gov; PlainGrants mirrors the extract and is not the submission system.

Disclaimer: This information is sourced from Grants.gov and SAM.gov and is for informational purposes only. Opportunity details, deadlines, and eligibility requirements change frequently. Always verify current information directly on Grants.gov before applying. PlainGrants is not affiliated with any federal agency.

Data sourced from the SAM.gov Assistance Listings and Grants.gov. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainGrants